The Hairpin Bend

Jeg har tidligere bragt det fantastiske essay “Jeg, en blyant“ her på bloggen (læs, læs!). I anledning af julen vil jeg fremvise endnu en smuk beskrivelse af ‘den spontane orden’.

Først skal I betragte dette flotte nærbillede af et snefnug fra bogen The Snowflake. Et snefnug er en vandkrystal, som er særdeles symmetrisk og altid enestående i forhold til andre snefnug. Der er selvfølgelig opstået en hel videnskab omhandlende dette spændende fænomen. Jeg skal ikke gøre mig klog på deres konklusioner og undersøgelser, men så vidt jeg har forstået skyldes snefnugs symmetri og unikhed i høj grad det enkelte snefnugs miljø, forstået som luftens temperatur, luftfugtigheden, sneets fald gennem luften og lignende variabler. Eftersom to snefnug umuligt kan have præcis samme miljø, vil de heller ikke blive præcis ens. Tilgengæld vil snefnuggets ‘arme’ være præcis ens, da de netop har oplevet samme miljø. Det er vist nogenlunde sådan, at det hænger sammen. I hvert fald er det fascinerende, at noget så kompleks og unikt kan opstå spontant og uden planlæggelse eller design. Det er dette, som Steven Horwitz skriver om i “Of Social Snowflakes…“ Han skriver således:

“When I see that snowflake, it engages my reverence for the beauty of the undesigned order of the natural world. Look at the symmetry and detail of that snowflake, and then consider that is the product of undesigned natural processes. I find it an object of awe that natural processes can produce a thing of such detail, complexity and beauty. It is said that only God can make a snowflake. Well for those who understand the science, or who are atheists, we know that you don’t need God to do so. But even to an atheist like myself, the spontaneous order of nature can (and should!) generate the same awe, reverence, and wonder that the contemplation of God generates in those who believe. Unfortunately, whenever my wonder at the beauty of nature is engaged, it is with a tinge of frustration.The frustration I feel is that so many smart and caring people seem unable to see and appreciate the identical processes of undesigned order in the social world. “Social snowflakes” are all around us, yet precious few seem to be able to understand and appreciate them to the degree we do the snowflakes found in nature. And too many people think that these “social snowflakes” require a “Creator.”

That snowflake produces in me the same aesthetic-emotional reaction I have when I begin to think about Leonard Read’s “I, Pencil,” or when I ponder the intricate, detailed, complex, and beautiful processes by which Chilean grapes appear in my grocery store in rural New York in the middle of winter. The pencil and the grapes are “social snowflakes”: they look simple, but when we hold them still and examine them with the analogous level of detail as that photo produces in the snowflake, they turn out to be the products of extraordinarily complex and intricate social processes that were designed by no one. My aesthetic reaction of awe and wonder is a response to what Pete Boettke, in a perfect turn of phrase, recently referred to as “the mystery of the mundane.” What is more mundane than a snowflake? And yet what, it turns out, is more beautiful and complex than a snowflake? And in the way their mundane surface appearances hide processes of production whose awesome complexity was the product of human action but not human design, and should equally be a source of aesthetic and intellectual contemplation, the pencil and grapes are indeed “social snowflakes.”

My fervent wish for the 21st century is that more smart and caring people can begin to see and appreciate “social snowflakes.” People who are so willing to accept the existence and beauty (and benevolence!) of undesigned order in the natural world should be more willing to open themselves to the possibility that there are processes of undesigned order at work in the social world too. These people know that no one can make a snowflake, but seem blind to the fact that much of the innocent blood that was spilled in the last century was because too many people thought they could intelligently design the social world. Not repeating those mistakes will require a renewed aesthetic appreciation of, and deep desire to understand, the awesome beauty and complexity of the undesigned order of “social snowflakes.”"

Lille hat-tip til Marginal Revolution.